- #AMD VS NVIDIA OPENCL BENCHMARK MOVIE#
- #AMD VS NVIDIA OPENCL BENCHMARK 1080P#
- #AMD VS NVIDIA OPENCL BENCHMARK DRIVER#
- #AMD VS NVIDIA OPENCL BENCHMARK PRO#
That means, all told, we tested with six games promoted by AMD versus four games promoted by Nvidia, and Nvidia still came out ahead (barely). Final Fantasy XIV, Metro Exodus, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider were Nvidia promoted games. While we're on the subject, for the record, The Division 2, Dirt 5, Far Cry 5, and Strange Brigade were also AMD-promoted games. The flip side is also true: Watch Dogs Legion and Metro Exodus are Nvidia promoted games that favor the 3070 more. Valhalla and Borderlands 3 are both AMD promoted games, so those results generally aren't typical. There's a catch, naturally: Valhalla is the first game in the Assassin's Creed series to utilize DirectX 12, and we know from experience that it's entirely possible for a developer to favor one GPU over another with low-level APIs. That doesn't mean Nvidia wins every game, however, and a few games strongly favor AMD - Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Borderlands 3, and Forza Horizon 4 all go to the RX 6700 XT, with Valhalla showing a 26% deficit.
#AMD VS NVIDIA OPENCL BENCHMARK 1080P#
Overall, 1080p ends up effectively tied, with the RTX 3070 posting a negligible 1% lead. Seems your not so aware of the real world, off the top of my head the VFX industry, Gaming Ubisoft (CentOS + OSX), GameLoft (Debian), Epic (CentOS), Autodesk (OSX and CentOS) and even the most advanced VFX program available is developed here with OSX and a custom Linux Distro based off CentOS.All of the games were tested without ray tracing enabled (if it's supported), so we're looking at traditional rasterization performance. Time for a quick lesson, OpenCL is a primary open source API and you want CUDA to be the sole provider of this tech and somehow blame it on MAC? hmmmīTW nVidia Cuda works perfectly fine in our office, an in fact we can run Cuda and OpenCL at one on the same program (ever since nVidia decided to embrace OpenCL).
#AMD VS NVIDIA OPENCL BENCHMARK MOVIE#
Which is seen strongly in programs like OpenCL performance in high profile movie studios and VFX like in FCPX, AVID and in house toolsĬontrolled and strong-armend their proprietary tech for the first 4 years until they noticed the competition embracing and out performaning CUDA at the Hollywood filming VFX level and with FCPX and AVID. It's generally provides superior acceleration performance then Cuda could provide back when nVidia was shunning OpenCL in favour of Cuda in most regards. Made for everyone, Not locked down to a particular platform, AMD video cards, OSX, Linux, Unix, Solaris, IBM, FreeBSD, Intel, AMD, Samsung and maybe even BeOS! So you are saying that it is the the users of OSX products (or possibly Apple) are the ones making it hard by embracing OpenCL? I'm bored in bed and just had to sign-up to these forums as after reading Vladdies thought process on this thread. I have been running in NVIDIA OpenCL GPU acceleration. I completely erased my drive, have a new installation of OS X 10.10.4 and I do have this problem now. However, I have updated in order to troubleshoot items a bit better.
#AMD VS NVIDIA OPENCL BENCHMARK PRO#
If it were me, I'd be running Premiere Pro CC 2014.2 on OS X 10.8.5 with NVIDIA CUDA enabled.
#AMD VS NVIDIA OPENCL BENCHMARK DRIVER#
I'm running Premiere 8.2, MacOS 10.10.3, CUDA 7.0.52 and GPU Driver Version: 10.2.7 310.41.25f01.įor you and others on MacBook Pro and iMac computers, I would 100% agree with you. So even if CUDA is faster in a speed test, I personally find it's not suitable for day-to-day work, at least on my system. If I switch to OpenCL, I generally get better real-time performance, and far less issues and crashes. I'll get a lot of crashes, and weird render glitches.
For me, on my MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Early 2013, NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 1024 MB), I've found using CUDA in Premiere CC2014 to be extremely unreliable.
0 kommentar(er)
